<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Blend Chainsaw Massacre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://social-blend.com/2009/10/26/the-social-blend-chainsaw-massacre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://social-blend.com/2009/10/26/the-social-blend-chainsaw-massacre/</link>
	<description>Presented by Greg Davies (cGt2099 from cGt2099.com) and Jay Fowler (SilentJay74 from JuicySnake.com) the Social Blend is a fun, and hard-hitting, podcast, with no respect for rules.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:05:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprucing Up The Site For 2010 &#171; Tom Cheredar</title>
		<link>http://social-blend.com/2009/10/26/the-social-blend-chainsaw-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprucing Up The Site For 2010 &#171; Tom Cheredar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-blend.com/?p=465#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>[...] also guest hosted a slew of awesome podcast shows (Cinegeek&#8217;s Culturesmash, Social Blade and Social-Blend). In fact, this year had been so jam-packed with great stuff that I have to write an entire post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also guest hosted a slew of awesome podcast shows (Cinegeek&#8217;s Culturesmash, Social Blade and Social-Blend). In fact, this year had been so jam-packed with great stuff that I have to write an entire post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VP</title>
		<link>http://social-blend.com/2009/10/26/the-social-blend-chainsaw-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>VP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-blend.com/?p=465#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Oh I see you are moderating your comments.... LOL   OK well I won&#039;t count on mine being published... Wow!   Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I see you are moderating your comments&#8230;. LOL   OK well I won&#8217;t count on mine being published&#8230; Wow!   Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VP</title>
		<link>http://social-blend.com/2009/10/26/the-social-blend-chainsaw-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>VP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-blend.com/?p=465#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Listened to your latest revisionist history extravaganza.

Let me appear on the show and correct the record. You asked me to appear a few months ago remember?  I&#039;ll set the record squeaky clean and present all documented evidence supporting the facts of the situation surrounding my ban.

RE: Privacy Issues on the Internet: What part of KatharineC  &quot;RESEARCHED  my identity based on the name of a film title I mentioned.&quot; can your  minds not grasp!  What part of private group emails were forwarded to Mixx Admin by one of your pals ( and I thought one of mine ).... can you NOT comprehend?

Do you understand this simple concept?  How many times must I correct the record?  I had  a total of 4 timeouts... the 4th one was not a ban because of the new TOS at the time.    Mixx chose to do that...because of my positive contributions to Mixx. That&#039;s their decision... not mine.  It was nice to do...but as we know lots of people on Mixx have gotten away with breaking the so-called rules haven&#039;t they Greg?

I had 4 and only 4..  There were not &quot; many many &quot; Tiime Outs...so please stop with the hyperbole....  It only proves my case further.   

Greg: your hypocrisy is amazing.... I had reported you for name calling more times than I can count...and nothing happened..  Recently,. you were put on a 24 hour time out just to save face ( did you and Kerry discuss that this might be a good idea beforehand just to calm things down ? )  but its interesting that Tessy got a 3 day timeout for a similar infraction....  Seem fair to you?  NOPE!

RE: Attacking your friends:  ummmm hello?  They were my friends too or at least i thought they were...funny how they had to go behind my back...( for what reason I still do not know and I doubt anyone will tell me ).  What&#039;s that about Greg, Jay?  Any ideas?  Hmmm  I have a few.

Very revealing and very sad..    Now let it go man...  Any time my name is mentioned in a negative way on Mixx I will come back.. Simple as that.     All you have to do is tell the truth...if that&#039;s not too difficult for you... which it obviously seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listened to your latest revisionist history extravaganza.</p>
<p>Let me appear on the show and correct the record. You asked me to appear a few months ago remember?  I&#8217;ll set the record squeaky clean and present all documented evidence supporting the facts of the situation surrounding my ban.</p>
<p>RE: Privacy Issues on the Internet: What part of KatharineC  &#8220;RESEARCHED  my identity based on the name of a film title I mentioned.&#8221; can your  minds not grasp!  What part of private group emails were forwarded to Mixx Admin by one of your pals ( and I thought one of mine )&#8230;. can you NOT comprehend?</p>
<p>Do you understand this simple concept?  How many times must I correct the record?  I had  a total of 4 timeouts&#8230; the 4th one was not a ban because of the new TOS at the time.    Mixx chose to do that&#8230;because of my positive contributions to Mixx. That&#8217;s their decision&#8230; not mine.  It was nice to do&#8230;but as we know lots of people on Mixx have gotten away with breaking the so-called rules haven&#8217;t they Greg?</p>
<p>I had 4 and only 4..  There were not &#8221; many many &#8221; Tiime Outs&#8230;so please stop with the hyperbole&#8230;.  It only proves my case further.   </p>
<p>Greg: your hypocrisy is amazing&#8230;. I had reported you for name calling more times than I can count&#8230;and nothing happened..  Recently,. you were put on a 24 hour time out just to save face ( did you and Kerry discuss that this might be a good idea beforehand just to calm things down ? )  but its interesting that Tessy got a 3 day timeout for a similar infraction&#8230;.  Seem fair to you?  NOPE!</p>
<p>RE: Attacking your friends:  ummmm hello?  They were my friends too or at least i thought they were&#8230;funny how they had to go behind my back&#8230;( for what reason I still do not know and I doubt anyone will tell me ).  What&#8217;s that about Greg, Jay?  Any ideas?  Hmmm  I have a few.</p>
<p>Very revealing and very sad..    Now let it go man&#8230;  Any time my name is mentioned in a negative way on Mixx I will come back.. Simple as that.     All you have to do is tell the truth&#8230;if that&#8217;s not too difficult for you&#8230; which it obviously seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

